FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

FZ BIBLE 4/30 UNIVERSES CASSETTES (5TH ACC)

**************************************************

CONTENTS: Universes Cassettes (the 5th Advanced Clinical Course)

32 Cassettes containing 33 lectures plus Introduction and Appendix.
The first lecture is also the final lecture of the 4th ACC and is
numbered 4ACC-72. Posted in 30 files ("+" used where a second item
is in the same file.)

01. ..... Introduction
+ 4ACC-72 29 MAR 54 EVOLUTION AND USE OF SELF ANALYSIS
02. 5ACC-01 30 MAR 54 UNIVERSES
03. 5ACC-02 31 MAR 54 SIMPLE PROCESSES
04. 5ACC-03 1 APR 54 BASIC SIMPLE PROCEDURES
05. 5ACC-04 2 APR 54 PRESENCE OF AN AUDITOR 
06. 5ACC-05 5 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: SAFE PLACE FOR THINGS
+ ..... APPENDIX
07. 5ACC-06 6 APR 54 LECTURE: UNIVERSES
08. 5ACC-07 7 APR 54 UNIVERSE: BASIC DEFINITIONS
09. 5ACC-08 8 APR 54 UNIVERSE: PROCESSES, EXPERIENCE
10. 5ACC-09 9 APR 54 UNIVERSE: CONDITIONS OF THE MIND AND REMEDIES
11. 5ACC-10 12 APR 54 UNIVERSE: CHANGE AND REHABILITATION
12. 5ACC-11 13 APR 54 UNIVERSE: MANIFESTATION
13. 5ACC-12 14 APR 54 SOP 8-D
14. 5ACC-13 15 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: EXTERIORIZATION AND STABILIZATION
+ 5ACC-13B 15 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: CERTAINTY ASSESSMENT
15. 5ACC-14 16 APR 54 SOP 8-D: LECTURE
16. 5ACC-15 19 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: UNIVERSE ASSESSMENT
+ 5ACC-15B 19 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: AREA ASSESSMENT
17. 5ACC-16 20 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: REMEDYING HAVINGNESS
+ GP-Spec 21 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: REACH FOR PRESENT TIME
18. 5ACC-17 21 APR 54 ELEMENTS OF AUDITING
19. 5ACC-18 22 APR 54 SOP 8-DA
20. 5ACC-19 23 APR 54 SOP 8-DB
21. 5ACC-20 26 APR 54 GENERAL HANDLING OF A PC
22. 5ACC-21 27 APR 54 ANCHOR POINTS AND SPACE
23. 5ACC-22 28 APR 54 SPACE AND HAVINGNESS
24. 5ACC-23 29 APR 54 SPACE
25. 5ACC-24 30 APR 54 SOP 8-DA THROUGH SOP 80-DH
26. 5ACC-25 3 MAY 54 VIEWPOINT STRAIGHTWIRE
27. 5ACC-26 4 MAY 54 BE, DO, HAVE STRAIGHTWIRE
28. 5ACC-27 5 MAY 54 EFFICACY OF PROCESSES
29. 5ACC-28 6 MAY 54 ANATOMY OF UNIVERSES
30. 5ACC-29 7 MAY 54 ENERGY - EXTERIORIZATION


**************************************************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. 

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


UNIVERSES (5th ACC) file 4/30 (tape 4):

Transcript of Taped Lecture by L. Ron Hubbard 

5ACC-3 - 5404C01 

Number 4 of the "Universes and the War between
Theta and Mest" cassettes.


BASIC SIMPLE PROCEDURES

A lecture given on 1 April 1954


Okay, and this is the 1st of April 1954, little more on
simple procedures, basics.

The problem which the auditor faces is a very simple
problem. That's what makes it so difficult. He has a human
being who is out of present time. Ordinarily this is the
target of the auditor, although you can use auditing on
cats, dogs and horses, and so forth.

As a matter of fact, I was auditing a horse the other day.
Got him into present time, too. It's very easy to audit a
horse. All you make him do is reach for you and you retreat
until he feels good and dangerous. And his spirits will
come up and he'll be in present time enough to be rid.
Horses out here are "rid"; they are not ridden. Have to be
a Park Avenue horse to be ridden.

Anyway, you're auditing a human being. Well, this has
certain liabilities. The reason it has liability is because
he's a human being. Now, this seems very obvious, but you
wouldn't be auditing him if he weren't a human being.

Of course, on some other planet you might find yourself one
of these days auditing robots which are thetan motivated -
thetan-motivated robots - which is to say, dolls. You would
audit him the same way except you wouldn't have a bunch of
ridges getting in his road and you'd probably make a Theta
Clear out of him snap, snap, pam! Take you a lot longer to
make an Operating Thetan out of him, but you'd sure
exteriorize him in an awful hurry. Mostly because the robot
wouldn't fight back. That is, the machine wouldn't fight
back. The plate that was representing the chest and the
sphere that was representing the head and the joints that
were representing the shoulders, and the pinchers that
were representing the hands, or whatever you had there - 
this wouldn't be fighting back, beyond one thing. Beyond 
one thing... But it wouldn't be fighting back really.

You see, all MEST has the common. . . all objects, rather,
have the common statement to them: "stick together." This
is the goal of an object. Ah, that's its end product is
"stick together" and "stick together."

Now, there are some wildcat elements that disobey this, and
one of them is sodium. Sodium doesn't like to stick
together. And another one of them is plutonium. You stack
too much of that together and it doesn't stick together
worth a nickel; it sticks all over the landscape. But the
common denominator, you could say, to any object you'd have
anything to do with commonly would be just this: it'd just
be "stick together." Any object on which you have your hand
has that as a motto - "Let's all stick together."

This is many times stated by thetans, too, in moments.
Benjamin Franklin said, "Well, we'll have to hang together
or we'll all hang separately." And it was too true at the
time, but there's enough sense backs this up so that you
get into all sorts of things. You get into unions and
brotherhoods, and social security, all kinds of things stem
from this. And that's perfectly all right for a bunch of
thetans to stick together unless they're doing it because
they're emulating or copying MEST. In other words, you
could stick together by compulsion just because you were
associated with MEST and its postulate was good with you,
you see.

It's totally all right if you say in a self-determined way,
"Well, let's all stick together." Okay, let's stick
together - not because MEST sticks together and we have to
copy it.

When a person is very, very bad off he's below that level,
you see, and he's having to copy MEST. "MEST sticks
together so I'm sticking together."

Well now, the body is pretty deteriorated in terms of a
being. I mean, it's pretty loopy. Maybe not as loopy as
you'd think sometimes, but it's pretty crazy. If you put it
on a self-determined basis and it didn't have any thetan
running it and so forth, Lord knows what it'd do. A thetan
recognizes this so he has to control the hell out of it.

Now, a body acts as its buttons are pushed. Hidden orders
are restimulated. This isn't true of a robot. When you
push the button on a robot which says raise the right hand,
it raises the right hand. And when you push a button that
says lower the right hand, it lowers the right hand. When
you push a button on the body which ostensibly says raise
the right hand, it's liable to kick you. See?

This uncertainty and insecurity on the part of the
body-and-thetan combination makes it a little more
difficult to audit a Homo sapiens than it would be to audit
a doll. Mostly because you say to this thetan, who is in a
body - you say to him, "All right, now let's run all of the
concepts relating to your father." And this hits the body
and you have touched some kind of a hearing button, and the
message which he more or less got and so forth was "Father
has buttons." You know, it's not quite the same, because
the body is a living thing and it filters, modifies and
changes orders and commands.

It can do this because it can be put into pain, it can be
punished, and it seeks to avoid this punishment. And so
when a thetan starts leading a body into danger the body
very often will go out of control, because the body itself
is afraid, quite in addition to the thetan. See?

We've got, you might say, a couple of people sitting in
that auditing chair every time. One has the motto, because
MEST objects say so, of "stick together." MEST objects all
say "stick together" and the body is all in the vicinity of
MEST objects all the time so it sticks together. You know?
Just as sensible as that. "Well, let's see, stoves stick
together so I'll stick together. That's what." You know,
just as reasoning as that.

And you've got this thetan who says "I want to control and
be free.". Well, that's bad enough to have that cross up.
But that's really all that's wrong with him: he wants to
control and be free - same time. And if we just had this
thetan, and "we want to control and be free," why, we could
fix him up. We could change his mind about controlling
things, and he could learn more about himself and learn
more about positions, and clean up old areas where he'd
gotten in trouble in this and other universes, and the
first thing you know we'd have somebody in pretty good shape.

But now let's take this combination, the thetan in the
body. Now, the body is obeying the command of objects - 
"stick together." And the thetan, because he uses the 
body for a communications medium all the time, is prone
to obey the body. The body is obeying an object and he's
obeying the body. That's great isn't it? Because the body
says "stick together," so he's stuck in the body.

Now, if it isn't very bad - it doesn't have it very bad, you
know, and the body hasn't been too pummeled around in
existence - you simply say to this fellow "Be three feet back
of your head," and pang! there he is, certainty.

Well, fortunately about 50 percent of the people you walk
up to this will happen to. You say, "Be three feet back of
your head." Pam! They're three feet back of their head.
"Now, give me some places where you're not," and some more
parts of 8-C and you give them what we call a Grand Tour
and some Change of Space Processing and run a few
avalanches and a few things like that and the next thing
you know, why, they're in pretty good shape.

That's because we did what? That's because we omitted,
incisified out, detached and disconnected the main problem
in the problem of auditing Homo sap - the body. We did a
bodyectomy. And now the thetan is not subject to this great
motto of the body, "stick together." So he doesn't stick to
everything. He says, "Look! Look Ma, one hand." He can go
over and put his hand on things, if he cares to have a
hand. He has great flexibility. Furthermore, he doesn't
have to be visible, so he doesn't need an identity. Of
course, a body does need an identity to survive. A body is
totally dependent upon inflow for its survival - totally
dependent on inflow.

A thetan is really totally dependent on outflow for his
survival. Opposite goals aren't they? Body is dependent on
inflow, thetan is dependent on out-flow. Put the two
together and you've got glue, because they're two stuck
flows. The body is on the stuck flow of inflow and the
thetan is usually on the stuck flow of outflow. So now we
try to pull these two apart.

Well, 50 percent of the people you say "Be three feet back
of your head." Pang! They're three feet back of their head.
All right. Let's take the other 50 percent. Maybe about 25
percent of the remaining 50 will be three feet back of
their head if you run the rest of 8-C. The remaining 25
percent are thoroughly convinced they're a body - oh, but
thoroughly! Sometimes convinced to such an extent that when
you say, "Be three feet back of your head," they would find
this impossible because, you see, you couldn't have
themselves remaining in the chair and then walking three
feet back of the chair because they would no longer be in
the chair. And that's the way the problem looks to them.

They know - if they know anything - they know they're a body.
And knowing they're a body, why, they know that they can't
be anyplace but where they are. They know that as a body
they can't pass through walls. They know they can't go
through ceilings. They know that distance is a great
liability. They know that time brings on old age and decay.
They know with great certainty that you mustn't go and
bang yourself into a high-tension generator, you mustn't
use a power line for a necklace. These things it knows.
You've got to button up your underwear and square around,
keep warm, keep well fed - arbitrary, arbitraries,
arbitraries, arbitraries. They know all these things. In
other words, they have accepted all the barriers of the body.

So we start to audit this fellow, this last 25 percent.
Well, quite a few of that last 25 percent will become
disabused of it easily, and so on, and it leaves us with an
almost completely immobile, unmovable, unshoven-outable 10
percent.

Now, there's the boy that's going to give you trouble. In
order to handle everything up to then, all you would have
to do is use, in copious quantities, SOP 8-C to handle
anything up to this 90. It's just how much longer you'd
have to do it. Just how much longer, that's all. Now, on
the first 50 percent we use Opening Procedure and then Step
I. We go through these things once, the guy is well out of
his head, he's stabilized, he's in good shape and ready to
take off And we just continued with 8-C on this boy, why,
he'd go right on up the line. Good shape.

And well, as we go down on the rest of that next 25 percent
we'd have to use Opening Procedure SOP 8-C and then Step I,
Step II, Step III, Step I, Step II, Step III, Step
I-they're out. And that's about the way it goes.

And now let's take that remaining 15 percent - well, you'd
have to go at it on the basis of Opening Procedure (lots of
it), Step I, Step II, Step III, Opening Procedure, Step I,
Step II, Step III, Opening Procedure, Step I, Step
Il-they're out. Now we go on through the rest of 8-C. You
must understand that 8-C is primarily designed, really, not
to exteriorize but to handle somebody after he's
exteriorized. It is the road to Theta Clear after
exteriorization. SOP 8 is really the little handy,
jim-dandy thing for getting people out of their heads with
crowbars. It's the crowbar.

Now, what about that last 10 percent? Is he worthwhile? We
going to bother with him? We have a couple of very wide
choices here. We can either say, "Hey, look folks,
Scientology works. Scientology works very, very well 90
percent of the time. Works fabulously well 90 percent of
the time. It is invariable as long. as we include only 90
percent of our cases." Well, what about those other ten
cases? Well, unfortunately, it's only when people get into
trouble that they come around and start knocking on your
door. So this takes this last doggone 10 percent and blows
it up to an apparent 50 or 60 percent of your cases, far as
people who are really in trouble.

It can look that much to you, because here you've got the
guys that are smearing in. They're going right on down the
whole route. And those are the boys that you're going to
have to work and slave and sweat over.

And those are the people that you're going to have to know
your stuff for. 

Now, there's no arguing with knowing Scientology when it
comes up against that last 10 percent. Boy, you sure better
know your Scientology. If you're going to get anyplace with
that 10 percent you sure better know what you're doing.
Now, in view of the fact that this very well might comprise
50 or 60 percent of the cases that you would address, it
says you sure better know what you're doing.

Now, SOP 8-C even poorly done will handle 50 percent of the
populace. In poor hands - they don't have to be expert - do 
the darnedest things.

But when we start striking for that 100 - if we're ever going
to say "Scientology is 100 percent effective," we have to
include that last 10 percent. God help all of us.

Now, this is a terrible thing, really, to pin down an
auditor to that lowest strata and say, "There's your
problem," and make him get in there and fight that lower
strata. But look, it could only be a liability if you
couldn't do anything about it.

So, we have another liability: the success of the auditor.
The success of the auditor, his morale, depends to a large
degree upon his ability to crack one hundred out of one
hundred. See? Otherwise his morale is going to take a bad
pushing around; because that last 10 percent are usually
upsetting, insulting and very clamorous. And they're the
people you're going to hear from.

You could have made ninety people in your community, that
you'd picked at random, quite well, and have failed on 10
percent of the people, or ten of the people of the hundred
you processed, and just failed utterly and abysmally. But
good golly look at you did miracles on 90 percent of the
people. Yeah, but the only thing that neighborhood is going
to hear is those ten failures.

Well, so it kicks back on an auditor. The auditor is in
there pitching, he's got a rough case, he's getting very
smart, he's getting very clever in auditing the case - and
the next thing you know, why, the guy is stuck harder than
ever in his head.

Well, an auditor faces just this, just so much on the basic
principles of communication - of duplication being the
basic principle of communication - an auditor has a tendency
to get kind of stuck too. See that? Here's the case he's
failing on; it's the tough case, so an auditor has a
tendency to become, himself a tough case. Just because he's
duplicating the cases he's failing on. See, he doesn't want
to duplicate those, he's going to resist those cases.

All right. Well, that's kind of the way the universe is
rigged, but it's rather easily licked. All you have to do
is know all there is to know about Scientology.

It's real grim when we get down to the fact that the only
reason you're studying everything you can lay your hands on
is just for 10 percent - just 10 percent. Otherwise, there
are two billion people on Earth; you could take 90 percent
and with very little effort, probably with groups, and you
could either make them well or make them into Theta
Clears. Fifty percent of them you could make into Theta
Clears with a couple of hours of group processing. And yet
here we are slaving away for that damn 10 percent.

Well, along the line as I've developed this material, I
have been confronted with this percentage. You could
actually draw a graph of the research and investigation of
Dianetics and Scientology against the dwindling unworkable
percent. In other words, as we went along the track here
the past few years you could find out, as we looked it
over, that the percentage of unsolved cases - now, I'm not
talking about my auditing; I'm talking about just auditors
in general - the percentage of unsolved cases was
diminishing, always diminishing. And the onslaught was
toward the unsolved case.

Believe me, practically anything can solve 22 percent of
the cases you walk into - anything. And Dianetics had it
pushed up to about 50 percent. But we have been making an
inroad on that remaining 50 percent, we've got it down now,
as near as I can figure to about 10. It's about 10 percent
that are giving us a bad time.

But for some little time now, in terms of my own auditing,
I have not found one of these cases unsolvable. Now, this
sounds incredible but that's true. I haven't found these
cases unsolvable. That's mainly because I know more about
Scientology than other auditors, naturally. And the very
best we have, have not found them unsolvable.

But a medium-grade auditor has found them practically a
brick wall. And a very poorly trained auditor hasn't found
just 10 percent; he's found upwards to 50 percent of the
cases unsolvable. See that? So what are we going toward?

We have to go toward, then, the most fundamental
fundamentals that can be fundamentalled. We have to have a
very, very good grip on all the basic principles. Because
we haven't got any room around here for a mediocre auditor,
and there isn't any room out in the society for one. Since
any eight-, nine-, ten-year-old kid with an hour's training
on SOP 8-C could solve 50 percent of humanity's ills, why,
it doesn't look to me like we should be worrying about
that strata. In other words, there shouldn't be what we
call a poor grade of auditor. You know, there shouldn't be
an auditor who is pretty good, you know, fair. Because, by
golly, he isn't going to get too much better results than
somebody who is hardly an auditor at all. No, it's that
last 10 percent we've got to hit if we're going to consider
ourselves up there in the champion class.

All right. With that in mind, then, we study fundamentals - 
the most fundamental fundamentals that we can. And these 
are very simple. These are the theory of communication, 
the theory of duplication, there's something-nothingness, 
the Know down to Sex Scale, and certainty. If we know these 
things real well then we can combine them in ways which 
solve cases when they take sudden flips and turns. Because 
about all the distances and directions that cases flip and 
turn into are covered there. In other words, a case couldn't 
duck out from underneath you if you knew these factors.

The theory of communication - all you have to do is just know
the basic theory of communication. There's quite a bit to
know about communication, but that's all you have to know.
The next most important thing would be, really, the
somethingness-nothingness problem. Just reducing these
things to even a finer line. And certainty - you'd certainly
have to know that. You should know the Know to Sex Scale.
It goes Know at the top, highest level. And then the next
level below that is really Beingness, but below that is
Think, really. Pardon me. I said below that is Think. When
I say Beingness, you go right down on another scale. The
Know to Sex Scale has many detours.

All right. Let's just take it in its purity: Know, Look,
Emote, Effort, Think, Symbol, Eat, Sex. That is the basic
scale. Now you can go on offshoots of that; you can put
Beingness in there. It really doesn't properly belong. If
you put Beingness in there you promptly go into
Thinkingness. You just short-circuit everything.

Anyway, these things aren't too much to know, but you have
to know a little bric-a-brac too. You have to know about - 
well, MEST is saying "stick together." And you have
to know that the preclear is in a body. You have to know
that. The preclear is in a body. Or he's in a body and
can't even tenant the body, and so although he is in the
body he has to think of himself as being not in the body.

You know, that's in his first inversion. There's lots of
odds and ends kicking around that you sort of pick up in a
unit such as this and under training and with some
experience. So in a few weeks you become very conversant
with a tremendous amount of data without really knowing how
much you do know. But as far as the basic fundamentals are
concerned, these are very easily brought to mind.

Now, let's take up the most searching of these fundamentals
and that's certainty. Certainty is a synonym for
knowingness. If you considered these two things in the same
category you'd have a new definition for know. You don't
know anything you're not certain of.

All right. So therefore, the keynote of such a process as
SOP 8-C is certainty. You say to some fellow, "Give me
three places where you're not."

He says, "Ooh, I'm not over there, and I'm not over there
and I'm not over there." You say, "How certain are you that
you're not in that first place?" "Well, uh... gee, I'm
not certain at all I'm not there. You mean to say that
we're going to play this game on this level. You mean for
keeps, for blood?"

And you say, "Yeah, for blood. Now let's find one place
where you're absolutely certain you're not."

Well, after he racks up this galaxy and a couple of
neighboring galaxies and so forth, he finds he's probably
not outside the MEST universe. And you say, "Well, you'll
have to do better than that."

Well, he finally pins it down that there happens to be one
bolt on one battleship which is sunk in one sea that he is
sure he is not right there - absolutely sure. And then he'll
take a long breath. Up to that time you've been playing
pat-a-cake. Certainty.

Do you know that you could actually take SOP 8-C and start
running it on a case - "blah, blah, blah ..." " Okay. Go there, 
now there, now there, now there. Now there, now there, now 
there..." He wouldn't get any better. Why? He's not certain 
of what he's doing or saying or anything else. That certainty 
is quite important.

Well, there's two kinds of certainties: The kind of
certainty which you get by just the knowingness qualities
of theta. You. You know. Not because you've been convinced;
you just know, that's all. And the other type of
knowingness is that low-grade knowingness which is brought
about by an impact. When a body has been hit, it knows it's
been hit. Well, that lower type of certainty is utterly
dependent upon two things: impace and energy.

Therefore, we could say there's two kinds of certainties.
There's a kind of certainty which is brought about of
simple knowingness, and the other which is brought about
through space and energy - two certainties. Well, you have to
get your preclear up from the certainty of impact (which is
what we call that MEST certainty) - from the certainty of
impact up to the certainty of knowingness: not because he's
been told, but because he knows.

You'll find most preclears of that 10 percent are operating
solely and completely on the certainty of impact. If you
hit them hard enough they'd know they were there. They
would be certain of anything which contained with it a
blow. This they would be certain of know.

Now, you get these levels of certainty. If there's anything
important about auditing it's this; given the fundamentals
of communication, which of course make auditing possible.

The biggest jump in the last year or so has been that
discovery concerning certainty. When I found out that
certainty was a synonym to knowingness, why, boy you could
use almost any process and make it work.

You sit there - a preclear is saying "Oh well, yeah. My. . .
I'm not over there, not there, not there." "How certain are
you you're not over there?" "Oh I uh... oooo!" He's not
certain of it at all. He has never addressed the problem.
You're making him look; you're making him inspect the
thing; you're making him actually know whether or not he
is. Up to that time he's been skating along two feet above
the clouds, and he has never - to that moment that you ask
him "How certain are you?" - he has never for a moment
looked. That's one thing a machine can't be, is certain. A
machine can't be certain.

Well, if that's so important then you would of necessity
have to include it in your auditing all the time, wouldn't
you. You sure do.

How many times per hour should you get a communication
change on the preclear? At least fifteen times an hour, at
least once every four minutes. If you're not getting a
communication change on the preclear every four minutes,
you're not auditing worth a nickel. Your auditing is very
mediocre.

This is a self-criticism that will sit there at any time, I
don't care whether you're dealing with the last 10 percent
or the first 50 percent of the cases we were talking about:
If you're not getting consistent and continual
communication change on the preclear; if his communication
lag isn't getting slower or faster; if his perceptions are
not getting brighter and dimmer. You see, I said just
change, I didn't say which direction. Better or worse, it
doesn't matter - get change. You're not changing anything
unless you're changing communication. And if this
perception change does not take place every four minutes
then your preclear is not auditing on any certainties
whatsoever.

Oh, it's just open and shut. Simple as that. You've audited
him for about five minutes - you've been saying, "Give me
some places where you're not," and so forth. And you ask
him at the end of about two, three minutes - you didn't
notice any communication change in the way he was
responding to you, so you ask him, "Is the room getting
brighter or dimmer or anything like that?" And he looks
around and he says "No." And you say, All right. Give me
some more places where you're not," and so forth and you
don't notice any communication shift. He isn't talking to
you after longer pauses and he isn't talking to you more
quickly than before and the room isn't getting any brighter
or isn't any dimmer, so forth, and you've been auditing him
five minutes; boy, you're a schnook, that's all.

You're just being stupid. What's the idea of sitting there
and wasting five minutes? You should have been able to tell
by the expression on his face or the way he was holding his
feet or something of the sort. You should have been able to
tell just by sort of intuition before that that this boy
wasn't certain of where he was going, what he was doing.

Very possibly it was indicated on such a case that you find
something in the room he's certain is there. You're liable
to find this fellow look around the room and say, "Oo-ooh,
I'm sure the whole room's here, yes sir."

You say, "Shut your eyes. Shut your eyes. All right. Now
tell me what the realest thing in the room is?" "There
isn't anything real in the room. Oh, wait, wait, wait. Yes,
there is. Yes, yes, yes. There's the pressure against my
back. That's real."

You say, "Fine. All right. Now there's some pressure
against your back. Now, is there anything else that is
real?" 

"Say, it sure is black! That's real."

Okay. You're auditing a thetan, and as long as you let the
fellow look around with his MEST eyes you're letting the
body continue to evaluate for a thetan. That's what's wrong
with him. The body tells him everything. The body tells him
where he is and what he's doing and how it feels, and the
body tells him...

How would you like to have your mother standing in front of
you twenty-four hours a day saying, "Now you're right here
in this room. Now you're sitting in that chair. Now you're
standing up. Now you're walking. Now you are hungry. Now
you are tired." How would you like that? Hm? Twenty-four
hours a day. Do you think anybody would be very, really
very sane if he had his mother twenty-four hours telling
him what to think, what he was looking at, where he was
feeling anything, what he was about to do, where he was to
go and where he was? No, that guy would be crazy, wouldn't he?

Well, that's about the condition the thetan is in, in the
last 10 percent. Twenty-four hours a day his eyes are
telling him where he is. The seat of his pants telling him
whether he's standing up or sitting down. The feeling of
his lips, the feeling of his teeth, the moisture in his
mouth are telling him where he is located, what he's
eating, what he isn't eating. The pangs in his stomach
tell him whether he's hungry or not. He just connects
everything with these evaluated messages. Believe me, it is
the body evaluating for the thetan. That last 10 percent,
that's all that's wrong with them, is every single thing
they think, they feel, is told to them. They're told to
feel it by the body.

Now, the body can't create anything in terms of energy. It
can't create energy; it can only convert energy. So you'll
find this last 10 percent totally convinced that they can't
create but that the body can convert. They know they can
convert energy, but that they can't create any.

So you find merely taking up the profession of engineering
is enough to put an awful lot of men straight into the
last 10 percent. Because they're studying the MEST universe
to find out what happens. And the MEST universe creates no
energy, the MEST universe only converts energy. So they
can't create. So where does this put them? This puts them
on the middle of the MEST universe curve. That curve is
create, survive, destroy. The three positions of the curve
- create, survive, destroy.

Early part of that curve, of course, is creativeness. It
starts in just creating space, creating energy to locate
in space, so forth. Well, so nothing in the MEST universe
is on that end of it, is it? So it must be up there near
the center someplace. The guy must be jammed at center.
Well, create, survive, destroy also matches the
communication curve which is source-point, distance,
receipt-point. And because it matches that curve, what do
we find? We find that an individual, as he drifts away from
being able to create, also drifts away from the other end
of the scale. He drifts up toward the center from both
ends. So this fellow can't destroy anything; this fellow
can't create anything. And, boy, when he's exactly in the
middle of that scale, he's being a rock forever. That's
what he is. Because life can create and life can destroy
and life can change, but the physical universe can't.

Now, when an individual has agreed thoroughly with the
entire physical universe and finds himself under the gun
twenty-four hours a day of an animal which is evaluating
for him by being evaluated for, he's in bad shape. Which is
to say the body knows where it is because the walls are
where they are, and the thetan knows where he is because
the body is looking for him and feeling for him and giving
effort for him and so on.

Well, there's that last 10 percent. There also is a shadow
of all of Homo sapiens. There's some of this in every case.
But in the last 10 it's damn near... it's practically
gone. You say, "Where are you?" to the guy. "I'm right
here" - he is the body.

But he is the body without knowing he's the body, because
he is the body and then is something else. This fellow is
the body, but then he can't even be a body, see, so he
is - he's gone on an inversion. You might say, he's a thetan
in a body which is being a bed post. Now, you get this; the
body is being something else too.

Well, cracking that last 10 percent, that's the stuff.

Okay, how do you do it? Obviously, it'd take violent,
frantic techniques. It's a desperate condition so obviously
it would take very desperate measures, wouldn't it? "Well,
the best way to do it really, you might say, is run engrams
while giving him an electric shock. That seems to be very
fitting. Well, no. Maybe that isn't desperate enough. Maybe
you give him a prefrontal lobotomy after he's been given
an electric shock, and then key him in real good by an
implant in the middle of it; maybe that's the best way to
run it. Well, that doesn't seem desperate enough. Maybe the
best way to do this is to give him a prefrontal lobotomy
while he's being stretched on a rack. Maybe that might do it."

That is the way thinking has gone on this subject in the
past. This last 10 percent isn't necessarily psycho. You
see, psychosis is a specialized condition which doesn't
have much to do with exteriorization or interiorization.
Psychosis is simply brought about by the types of
postulates the thetan has made and is committed to; that's
psychosis.

You can go up to a lot of psychotics and say, "Be three
feet back of your head." Bing! They're three feet back of
their head. Send them on a Grand Tour. Exteriorize them,
interiorize them from a lot of objects, remedy their
havingness. They're sane, they're able, beautiful shape.
Why? Because you got them out to a position where they
could change their mind.

No, this other is a condition which is mainly mechanical.
Hasn't much to do with a fellow's sanity. It's just that
the individual is junior to and is copying the physical
universe. Now, let's take one idea that he certainly has in
common. All these cases have this idea in common: They
think that the physical universe provides them with all of
their thinkingness and ideas. They have negated against
themselves as a source of original ideas. They must have
been told it by the physical universe, it must have been
done before, and so forth. In other words, they are a
pattern whose behavior derives from the behavior of
energy. They pattern all their conduct on how energy and
objects behave.

They follow straight in the groove. You find that Newton's
three laws apply, and they will apply to their behavior. If
somebody gets mad at them, then they must get mad at that
person. Stimulus-response. Duplication from an effect
viewpoint. They're not a causative viewpoint. They're not
really an effect. They're sort of midway between. But if
the energy does so-and-so then they can do thus-and-so, you
see?

"If I have enough gasoline then I will be able to get from
here to Keokuk." You see, "The car, gasoline, the
conversion of; then I'll get to Keokuk." But this they're
totally convinced of. It would never occur to them that
they could say, "Okay, I'm in Keokuk," bing! There's
Keokuk. Their idea to be in Keokuk means to them to have to
take a body to Keokuk. Well, this hasn't got anything to do
with them being in Keokuk. But if the energy will do it,
they can. In other words, energy gives them permission.

Now, such cases - if you got the idea of this case standing
there and the MEST universe giving them orders, and they
kept saluting and saying "Yes sir, yes sir, yes sir, yes
sir, yes sir" ... That's all this case does - particularly
this last 10 percent. The wall says so-and-so - they say "Yes
sir." The floor, so-and-so - "Yes sir." The headache says
thus-and-so - "Yes sir. Yes sir, yes sir. I agree, I agree.
Yes sir, I obey."

You see? Somebody comes up to them and says, "You know what
they're wearing this season? They're all wearing straw
hats." So they say "Yes sir," and buy a straw hat. The
slightest hint that this is the agreed-upon thing would
immediately cause them to agree.

Well, everybody's got that to some degree but this last 10
percent we're talking about has got it to a point where
they can't do anything else. If you were to come up to him
and say, "Well, everybody's buying straw hats this year,"
why, this person would say, "I won't. I won't buy a straw
hat. I won't! I wouldn't be seen dead in a straw hat!" And
they go down and buy a straw hat.

They're in a perpetual struggle, really, to get out of it,
and miring themselves deeper in it. They're in a ghastly
frame of mind.

Well, if an auditor doesn't know his business, they'll put
an auditor in a ghastly frame of mind too. My golly, you
brought them up half a tone on the E-Meter. You
straightened out all of the problem they ever had about
their small boy that they hit in the head with an ax by
accident when they were three or something. You
straightened this out. They no longer have any horrible
fixation on the subject of women. They say, "Well, women
can walk down the street. It's perfectly all right for
women to walk down the street." And before this they said,
"Any woman that walks down the street ought to be hanged!"
You know? This was their general idea. And you straighten
this out, they look at you, and they say, "Well, in view of
the fact that nothing happened in this session..."

You say, "My God."

They're still dramatizing the one command of the MEST
universe which is "don't change," which is "you can't
change," you must remain the same." And they're still
obeying that command. No matter what you changed in them,
then they would just stimulus-response tell you that
nothing had changed.

This is heartbreaking. Well, everybody does this to some
slight degree, but not like that last 10 percent. Okay?

What is, then, our problem? It's to get them the hell out
so that they can get some kind of uncontaminated truth,
quick. That's our problem. What do we have to do to do that?

Well, in view of the fact that they study impacts
continually, you'd better get them off of impacts. How do
you get them off of impacts? Well, their universes must be
dovetailed with the MEST universe with great thoroughness,
and with other people's universes. You'd better get them
separated out to some degree, because they're subject to
postulates that aren't their own postulates, so on. But
they can run a lot of processes like Beingness or Universe
Processing. Of these processes, Universe Processing is the
best process.

So, impacts you see have sort of welded two or more
universes together. So, you'd better just find out as well
as you can which two universes you're going to spring apart
first, and just spring them. In other words, unburden the
cases in terms of springing the universes off of them.

Let's get them out of Papa's universe. They're fighting
Papa's universe so doggone hard. They're not only stuck in
the MEST universe, but they've left that; they're fighting
Papa's universe. Oh, Papa's safe anyplace. Papa looms
everywhere. Papa is this and that and so forth. And yet if
you asked them real quick, or ran a technique on them for a
little while, you would find out that their body was Papa's
property, then they were being put up against their will,
usually, as Papa's mock-up. They're in Papa's universe.
Papa's the god of that universe, so of course all mock-ups
in that universe are put up by Papa. This is elementary.
This person is going through life protesting against the
fact that he's Papa's mock-up and that Papa is actually
putting up him as a mock-up.

Or that he's in Mama's universe too, and Mama's putting him
up as a mock-up. See? Or he's in the universe of the navy,
and the navy is putting him up as a mock-up. He can't put
up his own mock-up; he's being put up as a mock-up. Well,
if he's being put up as a mock-up, he of course is not
doing the primary and principal thing which a thetan is
doing, which is putting up a mock-up.

Thetans try to put up mock-ups and take down other people's
mock-ups. Well, if he's in Papa's universe then Papa must
be putting him up as a mockup. So of course his
self-determinism has gone by the boards. It's all
contingent upon the machinery laid in by Papa, because
this is all Papa's universe.

If you were to ask him on an E-Meter "Who owns everything?"
it'd probably go zzzzuummmmmmmm. And you could probably
ask him, "Well, does Mom own everything? Pop own
everything? Your first wife own everything? Your grandpa
own everything? Oh, maybe God owns everything." Well,
somewhere along the line you're going to get a hell of a
bomb. It's going to go zoom! "Who owns everything?" In
other words, "Who owns the universe you are in?" In other
words, "Whose universe are you in?"

And you'll find out that that is to a large degree the
trouble with this case, is he is obedient to the god of the
universe, and he doesn't have one himself. He doesn't think
he has any universe. He's just obeying the god of a
universe, and that god is telling him - if he's just in the
physical universe, it's telling him "Stick together, stay
inside, you are a body, be something. Don't be nothing, be
something." All right. If he's just in the physical
universe he's being told that all the time. Well, let's say
that he's in Papa's universe and Papa kept saying to him,
"Well, you have to be a credit to me. You have to make
something of yourself; and so forth. What would you think
all those people out there would think if a son of mine..."
See?

He's just going along all the way through life, "Well, I
hope those people aren't thinking anything bad now for a
son of Papa's. I hate Papa. Papa's no good. Gee whiz." It's
like an atheist, you know? Did you ever see an atheist at
work? An atheist believes more solidly in God than any
Christian I ever met. "There is no God!" Boy, talk about
violence.

Well, let's just compare this now to the relationship of
this guy or girl to Papa.

"There is no Papa! Papa didn't make this universe. I'm not
subject to the laws of Papa." Meantime, he's going
along - boy, does he believe in the laws of Papa. That's what
makes him fight. He knows he does believe so he has to
fight to unbelieve enough to retain some tiny thread of
self-respect.

Well, we just start asking him "Where's Papa safe?" and we
go on from there. We'd put him on an E-Meter and we'd
discover whose universe he was in by just asking who owns
everything. And we would find the deepest curve... We would
take somebody there - not necessarily the toughest one - but
we would take one of these universes and we would run it in
this fashion. 

You say, 'All right. Now let's spot a number of places
where Papa is safe." Now, if he's thoroughly enmeshed in
Papa's universe, something very interesting occurs: We have
to run the other side of the bracket. I said earlier it
wasn't very necessary to run the other side of the bracket.
But we're talking about this 10 percent now. Most cases it
isn't necessary. On this 10 perecent let's run the rest of
the bracket, because this case is really down the spout.
Now, we want to know then... We could just make it standard
practice, then nobody would miss at all.

"Now, let's see. Where does Papa believe you are safe? Get
the places where Papa could put you where you are safe."
And the fellow starts spotting it around. And the first
thing you know, every time he gets this idea it's a mock-up
of Papa that sort of pops out of his body. He'll comment on
this to you. Where is Papa putting him that he's safe. See,
we get the idea of Papa being out there and placing the
preclear as a mock-up around in various proper places where
the preclear would be safe. And the next thing you know the
preclear takes a good look at it and they're not mock-ups
of himself They have turned into mock-ups of Papa. They're
liable to start out as mock-ups of himself or herself; and
then they promptly flick to a mock-up of Papa.

Curious phenomenon isn't it? Well, Papa by duplication was
of course trying to duplicate himself. He wanted this
person, this son, this child, to be exactly like himself
So, of course, he has granted beingness to the preclear to
such an extent that the preclear is being otherwise
monitored than by his own energy.

This is just about as mechanical as you can get. Papa is
still monitoring this preclear. Papa has laid enough energy
into him so it still motivates him. He's subject to Papa's
universe, and then subject to the physical universe, and
then subject to his body's universe. Oh, boy!

So we've got a tangle of universes, and of course it was
difficult to take this last 10 percent apart. How do we
take it apart now? I'll repeat this: You just separate the
universes on the basis of finding the universe which he
seems to be thoroughly stuck in, and finding places where
the god of that universe is safe.

Well, he just keeps this up. If it bogs somewhere along the
line, have him find where the god of the universe would put
him so he could be safe - put the preclear so the preclear
could be safe. That'll run the other edge off. You'll find
the preclear thoroughly objects to being put up as somebody
else's mock-up. As a matter of fact you're liable to forget
that as part of the process merely because you might object
so thoroughly to somebody putting up you as a mock-up.

See that? "Where would Papa place you so that you would be
safe - so he could know you were safe?" We don't care about
the other phenomena that go along with it. You just play it
back and forth, and you will alternately run out of places
where Papa's safe, and find lots of places where Papa's
safe, and then find practically no places and then find
lots of places and then find no places. And all of a sudden
there's a sort of a spung and the universes actually go
apart. You can really sense their parting when they really
part.

Now, there may be so many people whose universes the
preclear is in that you have to take apart about a dozen of
them before you can finally get one of them to fly away.
But if you've tapped eighteen or twenty universes let's
make sure you spring all of them eventually, huh? Keep a
record of it; preclear is not likely to. You'd certainly
get somebody exteriorized.

Now, you'll get a heavy forward flow, which is one of the
interesting manifestations of Universe Processing. You'll
get a heavy forward flow from a spot in front of the
preclear, usually through the preclear's body, every time
you start running a universe in which the preclear is hung
up. He gets a flow. I said a forward flow; it's a forward
flow from that universe. The preclear is in it. Energy
sort of moves through the preclear. He gets an actual
manifestation of moving spaces and energy, if you're
tapping it.

If you were to ask any woman "Where are men safe?" and get
her to spot these places, one after the other where men
would be safe - she'd tell you usually first off that
they'd be safe anywhere - why, she'd get the sensation of 
a flow from in front of her, back through her. Similarly,
anybody she has anything to do with is liable to start up
one of these flows.

Well, that flow itself tends to pin the preclear in the
body. He starts to move out of the body, this flow starts,
so he moves straight back into the body and he holds on
because he starts to move against his will. He's still
holding onto a piece of energy, and this piece of energy
starts to float, you might say, in this flow, and he
doesn't exteriorize then. He stays in the body, he's pinned
there by flows which are liable to go into motion if he
shifts or moves. So the thought of shifting or moving is
enough to cause him to hold on convulsively.

Now, there's one point in this we mustn't neglect in
Universe Processing - one point in it we mustn't neglect -
and that is the fact that your last 10 percent almost uniformly
is packing around one or more (quote) "theta bodies." He
has a body of his own mocked up to comply with the physical
body he is occupying. This he had at the assumption, when
he first picked up this physical body he's got. It's
usually a black body. It is tailored in various ways. But
we won't worry too much about that. Let's just find places
where a theta body would be safe, if one shows up.

Now, the way one would show up is he's liable to feel a
very heavy pressure against his face, very, very solid, or
against his mouth. Now, pressure against his face, mouth or
against the front of his body - as though there's a being or
something stuck there - is an indication of the existence of
one of these theta bodies. And until you free that theta
body, you don't free the basic universe he's stuck in. So
remember you'll probably have to free Papa's or a lot of
other universes first, and this theta body universe is
liable to show up.

This time it'll blow. He'll get the idea it's a universe
full of demons and all sorts of weird things. We don't care
about that, we're just interested in exteriorizing him, and
that's the way we do it.

(end of lecture)



_


